Science for a Healthier Tomorrow
Does Ultra-Processed Food Change Kids’ Brains?

In 46 children of healthy weight, more ultra-processed calories tracked a stronger dorsal striatal food-cue response, but the one-year fat link was borderline.
Science for a Healthier Tomorrow
Science for a Healthier Tomorrow

In 46 children of healthy weight, more ultra-processed calories tracked a stronger dorsal striatal food-cue response, but the one-year fat link was borderline.

In a 12-week program, adults whose food logs showed more repeated foods and steadier calories lost somewhat more weight — 5.9% vs 4.3%, an association, not proof of cause.

In the first controlled-feeding trial in adults 18-25, the full sample showed no difference in test-meal intake after two weeks of ultra-processed food. Only the 18-21 group ate more — an exploratory result from 11 people at a single meal.

A crossover trial matched calories and macronutrients between ultra-processed and unprocessed diets in 43 young men. Fat mass rose about 1 kg on the ultra-processed diet; testosterone and sperm changes were non-significant trends. Two published critiques contest the interpretation.

A preliminary 14-day controlled feeding trial found that a ~95% ultra-processed diet left GLP-1, PYY, ghrelin and PP responses unchanged in lean young adults — an exploratory, industry-partnership-funded null.

A meta-analysis of 51 cohorts links each extra 100 g/day of ultra-processed food to about 14% higher cardiovascular-event risk. What the low certainty rating and the missed hypertension null mean.